Old-Time Finance, Newfangled Technology

It’s almost an article of faith that when it comes to technology, the financial services sector is ahead of most other vertical markets. The industry resides at the critical intersection of money and information, and for that reason alone—let alone compliance, security, competitive pressure, etc.—staying at the edge is critical. And of course, by just glancing at the budgets many Wall Street titans work with, we can get a sense of the enormous commitment.

However, as a recent piece in InformationWeek makes clear, the reality is quite different. The IT budgets are somehow both colossal and constrained, hampered by everything from tight markets to increased regulatory pressures. As a result, while many of these corporations might excel at developing and releasing new market-facing applications and other tools, they’re functioning with 40-year-old legacy architectures.

In the past couple of decades, this highly sensitive arena has seen hundreds of mergers and acquisitions, and chief priority has been integration—finding or building common layers between vastly heterogeneous infrastructures. It’s surely expensive to maintain, but would be even more costly to replace.

That said, major changes are virtually unavoidable. The operating environment has undergone seismic shifts in just the past few years. Tech-savvy consumers have a plethora of tools—and competitive options—at their disposal, and re ready to take full advantage of them. For their part, institutions must be able to offer a seamless customer experience during transactions that are initiated with, say, a mobile app and completed inside a branch setting. This mandates a back-end infrastructure that can handled wildly divergent technologies. Those institutions that can’t handle it are destined to lose business.

And who they might lose business represents a very different, yet equally significant, aspect of industry transformation. For a very wide range of services, old-line banks are no longer the only game in town.

As many industry observers make clear, there’s a banking revolution taking place, and it’s got nothing to do with the Occupy folks. It’s from a new generation of technology entrepreneurs who see a market that’s primed for change, and they’ve for the technologies to do it. Aggressive startups such as Billfloat to GreenDot are not financial services institutions in the traditional sense—they’re really tech players whose core product happens to involve the handling of money. In the process, they’re perfectly positioned to service millions of individuals whose needs revolve around speed, flexibility, convenience and customization, all of which come from agile technologies and new-wave innovation, not lumbering titans with legacy infrastructures.

This surely plays to some simplistic stereotypes, and it’s unfair to paint every major financial service firm with the same broad brush. But the reality is that with the broad-scale development, implementation and adoption of greatly empowering financial tools and technologies, the divide between individual and institutional has become a chasm. There’s an entire generation of potential customers that doesn’t see or at least appreciate the credibility built up by longtime banks and other financial services providers. They want instant gratification of the kind that only tech-savvy institutions can offer, and pedigree matters much less than it did before.

The ever-present industry shakeout might yet reach a phase where larger banks rely almost entirely on B2B services built around consolidation and size, while younger and nimbler enterprises with a mix of technology and moxie compete for consumer business. Of course, that leaves many current institutions that don’t fit into either category out in the cold. It should be interesting to watch.

Stability, Meet Innovation

Think financial services and technology—the two industries have so much to do with each other, yet in some ways they couldn’t be further apart.

To see that strange level of symbiosis, you need look no further that the testimony offered by Paul Volcker, former chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve, to a British parliamentary commission recently. In sum, Mr. Volcker is distinctly unimpressed by much of the “innovative financial engineering” found in capital markets these days. He believes that unless things change, financial institutions will commingle their accounts with the retail side of the business, and that will cause broad-scale problems.

Long lionized as an elder statesman of the industry, the former Fed chairman is widely credited with holding down inflation during his long tenure, and in that time earned praise (and some criticism for his regulatory stance) from both sides of the political aisle. Even in his ’80s, he led what was then called the Economic Recovery Advisory Board (now known as the President’s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness). Most famously, he is the force behind the Volcker Rule, a section of broader regulation that restricts U.S. banks from making certain investments that don’t benefit their customers.

So why is someone so visionary opposed to “innovative financial engineering?” This is perhaps where the chasm between technology and financial services is widest.

Think about it: Every corner of the technology industry thrives on innovation, and it is always understood that there’s a price tag attached. The new inevitably replaces the old, whether it’s a smartphone upgrade or an entire platform shift. In fact, ‘old’ is a relative term, since there’s always a next big thing or a new/new thing just around the corner. And we all want it that way; this is an industry where ‘disruptive’ technologies get complimented and bankrolled.

It’s not that the issue of regulation doesn’t come up occasionally—the government has certainly kept Microsoft’s lawyers busy for a long time with antitrust concerns, among other examples—but by and large new companies emerge by dint of merit and proudly take on a leadership position. That’s how it was with Microsoft, Google, Facebook, Apple and many others. Even the industry’s brightest minds have no idea what the next name in that pantheon will be; but you can bet that whatever technologies it offers will be not just innovative but disruptive. They’ll prompt (even force) everyone else to change, and that’s a good thing.

The one constant in all this change is that somehow, while the new gadgets and capabilities are always better and faster, they’re also cheaper. New companies and new technologies—all innovative, many disruptive—emerging on a regular basis, radically enhancing the entire landscape while cutting costs: How many other industries can we say that about? Financial services?

Well, these upstart start-ups couldn’t exist without financing, as the fine folks on Sand Hill Road in Menlo Park, the Flatiron district in New York and other hubs of venture capital can attest. There’s also tremendous risk involved; for every one Facebook that generates billions and changes the world, there are many that go nowhere. But still, the stark difference is the way the two industries operate (and are judged)—innovation and disruption is great in one and perilous in the other.

While there’s plenty of action at lower levels, most of the names at the top of the financial services industry pyramid have remained unchanged for decades. The only changes come when some conglomerate merge, or venerable companies go under through too many bad investments. For the most part, what we see now is what we’ve seen for a long time.

Mr. Volcker surely has a point about innovative financial engineering gone bad, but are there alternatives? Will stability in the financial services industry always mean essentially the same set of companies making cautious moves, while the technology side exercises rampant creativity to shift the paradigm regularly? Or can each industry learn more from each other?

 

What do you think? Let us know by tweeting at @bankingdotcom or posting in the comments below.

New Technologies Are Coming for Unbanked, Underbanked

*This post originally appeared on MyBankTracker

In the past year, countless prepaid cards have flooded the nation to target the large portion of the American population that is either unbanked or underbanked. Acknowledging that the market for these alternative financial products is rapidly growing, more tech companies are catering to this group of consumers.

According to a recent survey by the FDIC, in 2011, 8.2 percent of U.S. households do not have bank accounts, up from 7.6 percent in 2009. And 20.1 percent of U.S. households have bank accounts, but rely on alternative channels for financial services (e.g., check-cashing, payday loans and money orders), up from 18.2 percent in 2009.

Even traditional banks have jumped on the bandwagon to compete against non-bank prepaid-card companies and get a piece of the prepaid-card market.

Last fall, Regions Bank started rolling out asuite of products and services that included a prepaid card and check-cashing and Western Union services. In July, Chase, the largest bank in the country, launched the Liquid prepaid card that does almost everything that a regular Chase checking account can do.

“As banks have steadily inflated the cost of banking, more and more depositors are seeking substitutes for bank accounts with escalating costs, high minimum balances and surprise fees,” said Jim Wells, president of Wellspring Consulting, a firm that specializes in solutions for the unbanked and underbanked.

But, with the proliferation of financial technology, the focus is shifting to serving the unbanked and underbanked through mobile devices.

Last week, at a Finovate conference, two companies demonstrated their versions of a mobile wallet for the unbanked or underbanked consumer.

The CAT (Cash and Transact) mobile wallet, by Emida, is an app that is based solely on the consumer’s smartphone. Through participating retailers, users can refill their CAT accounts with cash (for a convenience fee of $1.50). Then, they can use the funds to pay for purchases through the app.

The Flip mobile wallet, from PreCash, is an app that allows users to perform instant mobile check deposit and make expedited bill payments — two services that were never before available on a prepaid card account.

“Although these mobile-enabled, prepaid card-based accounts are attractive to far more than just low-income consumers, one key to success will be in making the services available via even the simplest of mobile devices,” said Wells.

In countries where financial institutions are hard to come by, mobile devices are the preferred channel for financial transactions. For example, more than 17 million mobile subscribers in Kenya use a mobile-phone-based money transfer service called M-Pesa, which enables users to deposit and withdraw money, pay bills, buy phone minutes and send money to bank accounts or other users.

In the U.S., the decreasing cost of smartphones may make it seem like everyone has a smartphone — but non-smartphones are still the most common mobile devices among the low-income population.

According to the Federal Reserve, 64 percent of the unbanked have access to a mobile phone (18 percent have a smartphone) while 91 percent of the underbanked have access to a mobile phone (57 percent have a smartphone).

Regardless of the types of mobile devices, the demand for alternative financial products and services is there.

And, history tells us that unbanked and underbanked consumers could be the users of the next wave of financial innovation.

In last year’s fall Finovate conference, card-linked offers made regular appearances on stage. Since then, card-linked offers became more available to bank customers. Bank of America, Capital One, American Express and many other financial institutions began providing card-linked deals.

Considering that the conference offers a good idea of what products and services we’ll see in the near future, it wouldn’t be a surprise to find that, by this time next year, there are more prepaid card accounts and other financial services that live on mobile devices.

 What are you offering your customers? Let us know in the comments below!

What Small Businesses Can Teach Us About Technology

For the majority of businesses, IT is a DIY proposition – do it yourself. That’s because most businesses are small businesses, which makes information technology decision-making at the Mom and Pop shops a DIY affair, far different than their larger business counterparts, where procurement is a managed process.

While the mechanics of technology decision-making for SMBs differ from those at large enterprises, their early embrace of the “Bring Your Own Device,” aka BYOD, strategy has lessons for the industry as a whole.

Try replacing a small business employee’s iPhone with a business-friendly BlackBerry and see how far you get. Chances are employees are using their own phones on the job. This consumerization of IT, in which consumers bring their own devices to work, is increasingly the rule at SMBs, not the exception.

This raises many questions for employers.

  • How can I connect these devices to existing services, including email and payment processing?
  • How can I protect against loss or theft?
  • How do I make sure company data doesn’t leave if the employee finds a new job?

The costs associated with these questions sound extreme, but the benefits of a BYOD strategy will, in most cases, more than offset the costs. Not surprisingly, when employees use devices they like and have chosen for themselves, they’re happier.

And there are hard savings as well. By putting employees in charge of their technology, a BYOD strategy also shifts the responsibility for managing and maintaining – and in some cases, purchasing – that device to the user, reducing the overall company’s technology costs. The small business that lets its people use their iPhones is the small business that doesn’t have to buy them corporate devices.

Aside from the discussion of benefits and downsides, a bigger question remains: Why is BYOD so popular?

The answer lies in a simple but infrequently acknowledged truth: Most business technologies deployed to users aren’t designed for users. They’re designed instead for buyers, whose agenda is far different than their individual employees. For decades, enterprise technology vendors courted CIOs, IT managers and other buyers with promises to make their life easier: automate deployment, ease the pains of management, and lock down individual devices so that users required permission to install even a new browser. The user experience, the interface’s aesthetics and any functionality not directly related to the business were afterthoughts, if they were thought of at all.

And then everything changed.

Five years ago this past January, Steve Jobs unveiled the iPhone, forever transforming the way we communicate. For the first time, users had a device that was designed not for the employer and not for the carrier, but for no one other than the person using the device.

With its first mobile phone product, Apple not only leapfrogged every other device manufacturer on the planet, they completely reset users’ expectations. No longer would we have to settle for a device that was clumsy and awkward to use – which described virtually every device built for businesses. Users revolted and embraced, and today you see iPhones, iPads and dozens of other consumer-focused devices tacitly, even explicitly, supported within the enterprise.

For the businesses, then, the lesson is simple. Think carefully about who your customer is and who you’re building for. Because if you forget about the person who actually has to use your product, you can be sure that someone else won’t.

*This post originally appeared on the Intuit Network

About Stephen O’Grady:
Stephen O’Grady is an industry analyst and cofounder of RedMonk. He is based in Maine, a frequent traveler, ardent RedSox fan and focused on helping companies understand developers better and, in general, helping developers do what they do best. He is a paid contributor to the Intuit Network.


Video: Impact of Technology and Implications for Financial Institutions

CeCe Morken, senior vice president and general manager of Intuit Financial Services recently presented the opening keynote at the Barlow Research National Client conference. This is part two of the video series, and discusses implications of technology for financial institutions.

In this video, CeCe identifies and describes 5 key trends:
1. Nimble Entrepreneurs
2. Participatory Services Networks
3. Reputation Rules
4. Mass Data Control
5. Remote Genius

Watch the video below for the full details: