Anti-Social Media Hacks

Burger King and Jeep have nothing to do with financial services. But both banking professionals and the customers they serve would be wise to keep a close eye on the fast-food retailer and the automaker as they seek to recover from high-profile hacks this week. It could just be a sign of things to come.

As has been widely reported, both companies this week had their Twitter accounts hacked and, in different ways, defaced. There’s already been wide speculation regarding the perpetrators, but at this point that’s almost less important than the fact that the hacks occurred at all. The primary motive seems to have been to cause mischief, but most such intrusions have a more malevolent intent.

The news of these high-profile Twitter hacks comes shortly after the granddaddy of social media, Facebook, revealed that it was the victim of a “a sophisticated attack. . .that occurred when a handful of employees visited a mobile developer website that was compromised.” Facebook didn’t identify the developer site in question, though it has been identified named elsewhere.

So what does all this have to do with banking?

The reality is that this where many aspects of the financial services industry are headed. And unlike fast food or even cars, this is a practice fundamentally built around private information that needs to be kept secure. The most recent data breaches make it clear that we’re far from that level of security.

Most institutions are already active in the social media sphere, but the current initiatives mainly revolve around marketing and messaging. It seems only a matter of time before at least a few brave organizations make the leap into trying to develop Facebook into a transaction platform and transmit private information via channels such as Twitter.

In some ways, it’s a throwback to the early days of the Internet. The Credit Union National Association reports that a third of all credit unions now offer mobile banking, and all of the rest will have joined the fray within the next two years. That’s nearly twice the adoption rate for online banking when it arrived, which means that we’re already entering the second generation of mobile banking capabilities.

When social media is thrown into the mix, as seems almost inevitable, the growth rate will likely be even more accelerated—there’s an entire generation primed to enter the workforce that has a problem remembering a time before these technologies were fully integrated into every aspect of daily life.

The question is not whether social media channels need to become more secure; the focus should be on how to make them more secure, and who should lead the effort. We already have best practices in place for consumers, but it’s fair to think few will heed the advice. It’s up to us.

There’s no single constituency that can do everything related to security. The banks, the social media providers, the government, commercial and technology vendors—everyone must be involved. We need expert working groups, industry standards and new technologies. And we need them now.

Social Media Statistics: By-the-Numbers, January 2013

Below are some interesting statistics on social media usage. Feel free to share your favorite social media statistics in the comments section or Tweet @bankingdotcom.

  • 200,000,000 – The number of members for professional social network LinkedIn, an increase of 13 million since November 1, 2012. (Source: LinkedIn)
  • 181,000 – The number of Twitter users with “social media” as part of their bio as of January 2013, up from just 16,000 in 2009. (Source: AdAge)
  • 2 – The number of people that join LinkedIn every second, which equates to more than 172,000 new members per day. (Source: LinkedIn)
  • 92 – The percentage of people who share mobile video they have watched on their phone with others. (Source: IAB)
  • 200,000,000 – The number of monthly active Twitter users. (Source: Twitter)
  • 87 – The percentage of US magazine and newspaper publishers that have an iPad app. (Source: Alliance for Audited Media)
  • 33 – The percentage of US Internet users who said they ended a connection with a brand on social media due to the brand sharing too many updates. (Source: eMarketer)
  • 1 Million – The number of websites that have integrated with Facebook (Source: iStrategyLabs)

Did you catch the analysis of the most loved and most hated brands of 2012? Social Media Explorer has the breakdown.

Social Media BandwagonPhoto credit: Matt Hamm / Foter.com / CC BY-NC

We Need To Talk (About Security)

It’s easy to forget, but the most basic social media channel of all is. . .talking. And when it comes to banking, that’s come to represent a glaring security flaw.

Most financial services institutions are hyper-vigilant about building information security defenses into their online and mobile channels. It’s not just required by law, thanks to dozens of compliance mandates, it’s also good for business. More to the point, as documented on this site, many banks have launched education and marketing campaigns to spread the word about the security measures that they take, and what their customers should do to prevent theft, fraud and other forms of abuse.

However, that still leaves one key variable—call centers. It’s a curious dichotomy: many of us take those anonymous voices on the other end of the phone for granted (unless they can’t provide the answer we need), yet we freely give them all kinds of sensitive data, everything from addresses and social security numbers to account-specific information. Let’s face it, we have to give it to them to get the answers we need.

It’s almost reassuring to know that the calls are being recorded, since this helps improve customer service, and gives us a backup. It also means those calls are being stored and archived somewhere—and that presents a problem.

For the record, there are certainly regulations governing these practices. The PCI-DSS (for Payment Card Security Industry Data Security Standards) Council says such recordings fall under the scope of PCI compliance, but it’s clearly an area that has received less attention with regard to security.

There are several issues here that deserve scrutiny.

First, any kind of information exposed through voice communications offers a goldmine for social engineering scams. The range of tactics used varies widely, but they mostly involve manipulation for the purpose of gaining confidential information.  In the past, these attacks were of a random and mass-market nature. Now, thanks to the wealth of personalized information available through social media channels, they’ve become far more targeted and sophisticated. Every nugget gleaned through hacked voice communications offers a major step forward for the bad guys.

More broadly, so much of call center work is outsourced that it’s sometimes difficult to ascertain where the voice on the other end of the call is physically located, and where the calls are being stored. (In some cases, the company that wins the contract in turn outsources the work to a call center located in a different country.)

While the practice gained popularity as a means of greater business efficiency, outsourcing has in the past few years become a volatile political issue.  Legislation introduced in Congress would, among other mandates, require business to disclose to callers when their calls are transferred abroad, and potentially give them the option to be transferred to a U.S.-based representative. While U.S. employment is clearly the primary driving factor, security is frequently cited as a key issue.

More regulation may be inevitable, but as always, the industry itself is best qualified to implement the best security, not because it’s forced to but because it’s good for business.

Just as technology enables optimal communications, it also enables optimal security. For example, there is software that automatically halts recording when key words with sensitive information are used.

In some ways, call centers represent old-world banking, while the threats they face are quite new. What really matters, however, is that whatever the means of communication, it’s up to us to protect our customers, and that means protecting every kind of data we receive.

Satisfaction With Social Media Interaction

Guest post by Karen Licker, Social Banker & Content Contributor (Independent) at J.D. Power and Associates

Social media, a non-traditional method of customer interaction is clearly becoming increasingly important for banks to understand.

It’s no longer just a vehicle for customers to vent about poor experiences, praise their bank for exceeding expectations, or read about other customers’ positive or negative experiences—it has now become a legitimate service channel!

Social media sites not only allow customers to interact with their bank, but also provide another medium to converse with representatives, get questions answered, and resolve problems. For example, data from our 2012 J.D. Power and Associates US Credit Card Customer Satisfaction Study shows that during the past 12 months, 5% of credit card customers have contacted their issuer through their social media site to ask a question, resolve a problem, or make a request.

Although many questions or problems may need to be handled outside of the social media site that was the initial contact, it is important for banks to show they are listening to their customers’ “pain points” by providing an actual response to the social media posting.

Did you know that only 60% of customers who contacted their credit card issuer via social media received a reply?

Needles to say, the impact of replying to a posting on overall satisfaction is profound, as Interaction satisfaction among customers who have received a reply to their social media contact is notably higher than among those who did not receive a reply (802 vs. 748, respectively). Findings from our recent study also revealed that optimizing customer satisfaction with their social media experience does not end at merely responding to the request, but that issuers should continue to focus on the following:

  • Resolving the initial issue at hand
  • Offering additional assistance
  • Thanking the customer for their business

When each of these best practices are met, Interaction satisfaction increases to 839, which is 91 points higher than when they are not met.

Source: J.D. Power and Associates 2012 US Credit Card Satisfaction StudySM    

The Bottom Line:
With the continued advancement of technology shifting the way customers interact with financial institutions, it is vital for banks to proactively respond to the changing demands of their self-service channels and understand the importance of being responsive to feedback posted on social media sites.

 

Social Media Statistics: By-the-Numbers, September 2012

Below are some interesting statistics on social media usage. Feel free to share your favorite social media statistics in the comments section or Tweet @bankingdotcom.

  • 20: The percentage of US newspapers that now have online paywalls, twice the number that did one year ago. (Source: News & Tech)
  • 139: The number of Fortune 500 companies with a public-facing corporate blog in 2012, a five percent increase from 2011. (Source: UMass)
  • 24: The percentage of U.S.-based small businesses who claim to currently use social media in a “strategic and structured way.” (Source: eMarketer)
  • 63: The percentage of Pinterest users that are age 35 or older. (Source: Pingdom)
  • 129.7 million dollars in projected US mobile advertising revenue for Twitter in 2012. (Source eMarketer)
  • 235,000,000: The number of people who play games on Facebook each month. (Source: Facebook)
  • 65: The percentage of U.S. grocery retail executives who said they plan to use social media tools like Facebook and Twitter as part of their marketing arsenal within the next five years. (Source: eMarketer)

It’s no secret that smartphone growth is growing rapidly, but a Nielsen snapshot shows that teens and young adults lead growth in smartphone adoption. Read more here.

The Klout-Influenced Credit Score Would Give Credit Where It Isn’t Due

*This post originally appeared on MyBankTracker

If you’re an insufferable person who speaks on social media panels with any degree of regularity, you’re probably more aware of what your Klout score is than you are your credit score. After all, you can check your Klout score all day — you can only check your credit score once a year from each bureau. Who has the time? You live an active social media lifestyle, and retweets probably matter more to you than your mortgage rate. You are pretty terrible. Well we’ve got good news for you: at Movenbank, your social media influence might soon influence your credit score — a terrifying thought!

Movenbank, a soon-to-launch financial services company, launched something called the CREDscore in private alpha. It is comprised of a number of different factors: your actual credit score, your personality and, yes, your social media influence. Strange as it sounds, Movenbank might actually make business decisions based on your Klout — or something a lot like it.

First, Movenbank puts you through a financial personality quiz to better understand your relationship with money. You’re assigned a “type”: salesperson, professor, accountant, rockstar, entrepreneur, officer, artist (wouldn’t want to get that one!), breadwinner or trader. For now, this is just filler, but it might factor into your score in the future.

The CREDscore also takes into account actually important financial information like annual income, how much you save per month, how much you have saved up, and your FICO score. So there is hard data factored into the score.

But users can also connect their Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn or Google Plus accounts to give Movenbank a better sense of your social media influence. The company explains why in a blog post that describes different credit profiles that a CREDscore could benefit. Here’s Ashley, someone who has fallen on hard times, but has a lot of LinkedIn contacts:

Then there’s Ashley. Ashley’s a bit older than Matt and Jessica, but he lost his job a few years ago. Then he lost his house. Ashley’s suffering. The bank foreclosed and now he can’t get any opportunity to get new things started.

But he has an idea. He wants to launch a new business that makes funky trainers that tweet and check-in on foursquare as you run.

Sounds stupid, but don’t be fooled. According to LinkedIn, Ashley has a heavy influence on some potential investors who are sniffing around the ‘Tweener,’ as he calls it. The only thing is he has a problem. The mainstream financial service providers don’t want to know him.

Here at Movenbank though, we love Ashley.

We love Ashley because we can see he’s on the cusp of a breakthrough. But we can’t just give Ashley all the things he wants, so we offer him a deposit account and a limited loan facility to get the business started. The loan facility increases over time, as his Klout increases.

One reason why underwriters typically rely on hard data when assessing credit risk, is because dangling lots of money in front of people who need it desperately can often make them less than honest. Low-documentation and no-documentation loans are called “liar loans” for very good reason: if you’re self-reporting income to qualify for a mortgage, it’s easy to fudge it upward a bit, especially when your mortgage broker encourages you to. Despite what Movenbank would like to think, it’s very easy to fake social media influence — it’s just a pathetic and humiliating experience most of us would readily avoid. Unless we really wanted a loan from Movenbank, perhaps.

This sort of thinking only makes sense if you’re constantly surrounded by tech entrepreneurs all day, as they network and jockey for money and influence. Most of us never need business loans for shoes that integrate with social media. Our financial needs are personal: saving for our first home, retirement, our kids’ education, a vacation, whatever.

But in its defense, CREDscore addresses these issues, too. A higher CREDscore might mean better terms for customers on their accounts: higher savings rates, lower borrowing costs, or lower fees. Strangely, the range is not yet public; those who have been given CREDscores have not been told whether it is good, bad, mediocre, anything. Just: here’s a number, it might mean something later.

Movenbank will launch to the public later this year. And people with parody Twitter accounts might get a better rate on their savings account than you do. It’s strange, because one might reasonably suspect that introverts might have better financial habits than people who tweet every thought or joke that pops into their head. Being impulsive online is different from being impulsive at Macy’s, sure, but being freed of the rigors of a social life would likely cut 40% of the spending out of my monthly budget.

Klout is likely as good a measure of creditworthiness as waistline. Sure, I can infer a lot of lifestyle differences between the man with the 44 inch waist and the man with the 30 inch waist, but just because one probably spends more of his income on cheeseburgers, it doesn’t really tell me how likely he is to pay back a loan — and it definitely doesn’t mean he’s worthy of lower fees or higher savings rates, or vice versa.

But the CREDscore is still in its testing phase. It’s quite possible that none of this will come to pass. So you can stop spamming LinkedIn VC groups — you might end up burning bridges.

About Willy Staley:  Willy is a 25-year-old writer, and as a native San Franciscan, he is unreasonably loyal to Bank of America, if only for their superhero-like origin story, involving the 1906 earthquake and Italian fruit vendors.

FI Spotlight: Arvest Bank

In our latest FI Spotlight we got the opportunity to speak with Jason Kincy, Marketing Director at Arvest Bank. In our Q&A below, Jason talks to us about the J.D. Power and Associates 2012 Retail Banking Satisfaction Study, customer satisfaction and social media. Arvest Bank ranks highest both in the South Central Region and in the Southwest Region in the J.D. Power and Associates 2012 Retail Banking Satisfaction StudySM. This is the fourth year that Arvest has been recognized with a regional award. Arvest has been ranked highest in satisfaction with retail banking in the Southwest (2010, 2011, 2012), Southeast (2009) and South Central (2010, 2012) regions.

 

Q: In a few sentences, can you tell me about Arvest Bank?
A: Arvest Bank operates more than 240 bank branches in Arkansas, Oklahoma, Missouri and Kansas through a network of 16 locally managed banks, each with its own board of directors and management team. These banks serve customers in 90 communities with 12-hour weekday banking at most locations. Arvest also provides a wide range of banking services including loans, deposits, treasury management, asset and wealth management, life insurance, credit cards, mortgage loans and mortgage servicing. Arvest operates a mortgage company, asset management company, insurance division and mortgage servicing company.

Q: In the J.D. Power and Associates 2012 Retail Banking Satisfaction Study, Arvest Bank scored among the best in all categories: overall satisfaction, product offerings, facility, account information, fees and account activities. What do you attribute to your success in scoring so high on the J.D. Power Rankings?
A: No bank is perfect and we have areas that we’re working hard to improve. Arvest focuses on providing many of the banking attributes that drive customer satisfaction. We operate a way that makes banking convenient no matter how the customer defines convenience – whether that’s at an extended hours branch location, on the phone, online or via mobile banking. When we do interact with customers on a personal transaction, our associates provide an efficient and courteous experience for the customer. These interaction experiences combined with fairly priced fees and an account lineup with options for everyone combine to create a satisfied customer.

Q: Do you have any advice for FI’s looking to raise their banking satisfaction scores?
A: Every institution and market is different, but there are some general principles that banks performing highly in customer service rating generally share, so we, like many banks study customer satisfaction studies and trends to learn from the top performers. Creating value to the customer is key to their satisfaction. Arvest is very responsive to customer feedback provided in person or through customer surveys and will take action when an adjustment is needed. This responsiveness allows us to fix small issues before they become large customer frustrations and to tweak our products or services based on customer needs, which leads to happier customers.

Q: On your website, you have a “How are we doing?” survey for customers. How long have you had this survey on your site?
A: We have conducted online surveys for several years. The customer has the option to choose to provide feedback on a branch, telephone or online experience.

Q: Is it a useful tool for obtaining customer feedback?
A: Yes. We receive many surveys from customers and they are generally very transparent in their feedback. The surveys are provided to the local market where the customer does their banking so that local management can address service levels accordingly and follow up directly with the customer when appropriate.

Q: Arvest received a high score in the product offerings section of the J.D. Powers Rankings. What range of products do you offer to your customers?
A: We believe our product lineup has something for everyone, whether you want an extremely basic account or an account with total relationship value added services.  The addition of perks that are becoming more popular like family identity theft coverage has created an overall perception of value. Our checking accounts range from free with no balance requirements to fee based accounts with the options and perks customers have told us are important to them.

Q: We know mobile banking has grown by leaps and bounds over the past few years. Have you seen the same trend with Arvest customers?
A: Arvest has provided free mobile banking since late 2007 and transitioned to an improved offering in October of 2011. We have SMS/Text banking, mobile web banking and apps for iPhone and Android. Our growth over the past 12 months has been phenomenal, with our user base doubling in size. Mobile banking will continue to grow at a torrid pace and we expect it to become increasingly more integral in how customers do their banking.

Q: Let’s talk social. Arvest is on Facebook and Twitter. Do you view social channels as a good way to interact with customers?
A: Yes, it allows us to participate in communication spaces where many of our customers are. It’s another way to share your brand themes and persona.

Q: How has social media helped Arvest with customer communication?
A: Social media has allowed us to share information that doesn’t fit a traditional website such as community events, up to date announcements and consumer education. A very valuable component of social media to banks is the ability to observe customer sentiment and opinions and then apply those to maintaining quality service. Many customers will be more unfiltered with their opinion in social media than they will in a formal survey.

Q: Is there anything else you want to add?
A: Maintaining quality service requires an ongoing effort to continue to deliver on customer expectations. Even though Arvest has won multiple J.D. Power and Associates trophies over the past few years, we have a team of associates who look for weaknesses in the study to identify areas where we can improve. We also research the top performers to try and learn what makes them successful.

Social Banking: Blessing or Curse?

While the topic of Facebook and banking has generated plenty of heat (though not necessarily a lot of light), the debate seems mostly focused on two broad issues: The much-maligned IPO, and the notion that the company might take business away from the banking sector, such as through Facebook Credits or a self-branded credit card.

The IPO, of course, continues to stir debate—just this week, it was reported that UBS AG, Switzerland’s largest bank (by assets) took a hit of more than $350 million, nearly half its entire second-quarter profit, on the ill-fated deal. (UBS now plans to join several other brokerage institutions readying legal action against NASDAQ). As for Facebook serving becoming a financial institution itself, the mobile payment system for third-party developers got a facelift recently, and there’s now a better subscription billing system.  However, speculation still seems further along than reality.

But there’s another strain emerging that might have even greater ramifications. This is where global financial services conglomerates enable individuals, and perhaps businesses, to do their banking via Facebook.

It’s not as if banks aren’t aware of Facebook—they all have a presence on the social network platform, and quite a few have built branded communities on it. However, that’s still more marketing than finance. What’s happening now goes quite a bit further.

Much of the early action seems to be coming from overseas. First National Bank of South Africa, ASB Bank of New Zealand and Commonwealth Bank of Australia are all launching apparently major initiatives to capitalize on ‘social banking.’ Essentially, the plan is to enable peer-to-peer (P2P) payments over the network between ‘friends.’ Of course, it almost certainly won’t stop there: It’s easy to envision a future in which virtually all consumer transactions, including bill payments, are done over Facebook, since just about everyone and everything is a member anyway.

For the record, skeptics are already out in force, warning consumers that blurring the line between a bank and a social network could bring serious problems. But it may be too late to put the genie back in the bottle. While somewhat smaller financial institutions can be perceived as risk-takers, Citigroup is something else entirely. That financial powerhouse is now asking customers whether they would do their banking via Facebook. It’s also been noted that JP Morgan Chase actually has more ‘likes’ on Facebook than Citi, and is surely looking for ways to monetize that advantage. Besides, as more financial transaction are conducted via mobile applications, the prospect of drastically altering banking practices doesn’t seem nearly so outlandish.

Looking ahead, it’s important to understand that any wholesale change in banking will not take place in a vacuum—Facebook will change, along with user habits, security measures, regulations, etc., before that happens. While it already counts a sixth of the world’s population as members, Facebook is still simplistic in terms of its interface and primitive in its technology underpinnings. Look at the typical user interface—there’s virtually no distinction permissible between different categories of ‘friends,’ or non-transparent and secure ways to do much business. That’s almost surely going to change.

Most consumers now do almost all their communicating via Facebook, just as social networking and social media are no longer separate entities but woven into every aspect of our lives. At some point, everything will become, in some sense, ‘social.’ The idea that banking can somehow stay immune is naïve. Instead of resisting it, let’s just do our part to make it easy, secure and profitable.

FI Spotlight: Vantage Credit Union

We got the chance to interview Eric Acree, executive vice president at Vantage Credit Union (VCU) about the TweetMyMoney program VCU launched in 2009. VCU was early to the social scene when they launched TweetMyMoney, the world’s first banking-by-Twitter service, on September 28, 2009. The service is available exclusively to Vantage members and is free of charge. With TweetMyMoney, members can monitor their account balances, deposits, withdrawals, holds and cleared checks with simple commands. Members can also transfer funds within their own account to different account types (checking to savings, checking to loans, etc.).

We chatted with Eric to learn more about the program:

Q: Where did the idea for the campaign come from, and how have you seen it grow over the past three years?

A: The idea for TweetMyMoney came out of an internal online brainstorming session between some technology staff and business staff (all participants were social media users as well). At that time, we did not have a ton of money available to hire a firm to create a mobile app, but we desperately wanted to provide something to our members. So, we were discussing possible ways to create a mobile banking solution for little money. There was much discussion on how we could possibly use SMS technology, which then led to ways to possibly use Facebook and Twitter. The Twitter platform provided the perfect opportunity for us and we were already familiar with it. Not everyone uses Twitter and not all Twitter users are comfortable using TweetMyMoney. So the growth of the service (when compared to more traditional/mass market mobile banking solutions) has been relatively small. However, we have several hundred members who use the service a lot, on a regular basis. It’s important to note that Vantage is currently developing more traditional mobile banking apps and plans to offer them to members late this summer. We will have a native mobile banking app for the iPhone, Android and iPad.

Q: What (if any) benefits do members receive from using TweetMyMoney versus SMS banking notifications?

A: There isn’t much difference between the two technologies since TweetMyMoney operates in a similar way to SMS. From a cost standpoint, using TweetMyMoney is a much cheaper option for Vantage since we did not have to invest money into a SMS infrastructure. For members who are Twitter users, the benefit is using a familiar technology to quickly and safely obtain information about their accounts. Obtaining information via TweetMyMoney is faster than using a web page (or even a mobile app) since TweetMyMoney does not require the same log-in steps.

Q: How have you addressed security concerns/questions around using Twitter to send and receive confidential banking information? Do you get many member inquiries about security concerns over using Twitter, or are they excited to have a new way to access financial information?   

A: Like other technology innovations launched in the past, TweetMyMoney quickly generated a lot of passionate commentary and opinions in the technology blogosphere after we announced its launch. We have incorporated several security layers and measures to ensure it is safe to use. When members use TweetMyMoney, the information contained in their tweets, as well as the information sent back to them, is generic, e.g. transaction commands, dollar amounts, dates, account code types, etc. In fact, most of this type of information is sent to millions of people every day by virtually all financial institutions in the form of e-alerts. If a member’s Twitter account was somehow compromised, all a hacker would see is this generic information, which is useless to the hacker. The key point is: no account number, nor other sensitive personal or account information, is displayed in TweetMyMoney. All the sensitive information is kept safe at Vantage behind the online banking firewall. Vantage also implemented a new security feature called Correspondence Authentication Codes inside our online banking service. So, every outbound electronic communication originating from Vantage (including tweets from TweetMyMoney) contains a unique code for each day of the week, thus ensuring the message is authentic when the member recognizes their unique code. Members can view and change these codes from their user profile section of our online banking service. In summary, we have taken extraordinary steps to ensure TweetMyMoney is safe. We ran its design and security controls by an industry-leading firm that has an exceptional track record in their line of work. They provided an unbiased opinion and helped validate our approach before we launched TweetMyMoney. Just for the record, in the nearly three years of the TweetMyMoney service being live, we have experienced ZERO security problems. Not one single security breach of any kind has occurred with TweetMyMoney.

Q: Vantage CU is socially savvy, with Twitter, Facebook and YouTube channels. What platform do you see the most member engagement on? Are members more interested in interacting with Vantage CU via Twitter or Facebook?

A: We are active on our Twitter handle and Facebook page. Our YouTube channel has few subscribers and we plan to utilize this platform more in the future. But, we see the most engagement with our members via Twitter.

Q: Final thoughts before we wrap up this interview?

A: The real beauty of TweetMyMoney is we have devised a safe and innovative way to communicate important financial information via an unsecure social media network. TweetMyMoney was our first (and boldest) mobile banking step, but we are excited to be bringing the native mobile banking apps for iPhone, Android and iPad users later this summer.

Want to see more of TweetMyMoney? Check out VCU’s videos about the program or connect with VCU on Twitter.

Social Media Statistics: By-the-Numbers, July 2012

It’s been a few months since we published a social media stats post, and there has been a lot of social activity this summer! Below are some interesting statistics on social media usage. Feel free to share your favorite social media statistics in the comments section or Tweet @bankingdotcom.

  • 250,000,000 The number of accounts that have upgraded to or signed up for a Google+ account (Source: Google)
  • 17: the percentage of cell phone owners who do most of their online browsing on their phone, rather than a computer or other device (Source: Pew Internet)
  • 3.6 billion dollars in gross revenue is projected by the end of 2012 for video sharing platform YouTube (Source: Citi)
  • 52: the percentage of all cell phone owners who use their phones while watching television (Source: Pew Internet)
  • 18: the percentage of teens who would stop communicating altogether if their favorite technological channel of communication disappeared (Source: AWeber)
  • 7.56: the average percentage of traffic to Facebook Pages from external referrals (Source: PageLever)
  • 41.7: the percentage of the top 10,000 websites that have some form of Twitter link on their homepage (Source: Pingdom)
  • 36.6 billion online content videos were viewed by US Internet users in May 2012 (Source: comScore)
  • 152,000,000: the number unique US visitors to Facebook.com in May 2012, placing the social network in second place behind Google (Source: Nielsen)

Curious if LinkedIn Groups are useful? Here are some tips on how marketers can benefit from participating in LinkedIn Groups.