What We’re Reading: Google Glass, Payments and Branches

Below are interesting stories the Banking.com staff has been reading over the past week. What have you been reading? Let us know in the comments section below or Tweet @bankingdotcom.

 

  • Google’s Glass Guidelines Provide Clues to Future Bank Apps

American Banker

Banks will be prohibited from advertising on Google Glass, the wearable computing product the tech giant has just started releasing to privileged developers and early adopters. In guidelines and best practices Google released this week, the search engine company told developers it will reject apps for the device — so-called “Glassware” — that it considers an irritation to users. “Google is very clear about apps limiting distraction, not [bothering] people all the time, so this isn’t something that banks can use as a platform to coax their customers 100 times a day,” says Sarah Rotman Epps, an analyst with Forrester Research. “But it is potentially a platform for them to deliver utility when it could be most useful.”

Read more

  • Phablet, Superphone Shipments Expected to Reach 825 Million Units in 2018

American Banker

They may look ridiculous, but phablets and superphones — mini tablets and extra-large phones — have a bright future, according to research released today by Transparency Market Research. According to a new market report, “Phablets and Superphones Market — Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth and Forecast, 2012 — 2018,” the global phablets and superphones market is expected to reach $116.4 billion by 2018, growing at a compound annual growth rate of 44.1% from 2012 to 2018. The number of units of the devices is expected to grow at a CAGR of 25.8% from 2012 to 2018, and reach 825 million by 2018.

Read more

  • Critical Bank Management Skills for the 21st Century

Bank Systems & Technology

In the past, your teams needed to be able to demonstrate a detailed grasp of policy, rigor in analyzing reports, and dedication to data quality — but to tackle today’s challenges, a different form of expertise is required. The rapidly shifting economic and regulatory conditions of the 21st century, mean that market changes often outpace management skills. In the past, your teams needed to be able to demonstrate a detailed grasp of policy, rigor in analyzing reports, and dedication to data quality – but to tackle today’s challenges, a different form of expertise is required.

Read more

  • How Apple and Amazon Will Shape Mobile Payments

Bank Systems & Technology

Apple and Amazon will continue to drive customer expectations and create big shifts in the retail world even if they don’t release a mobile payments solution. Many traditional payments players like banks have been worried for a while about the possibility of Apple entering the mobile payments space at the point of sale. Many speculated that the last iPhone release would include an NFC chip, which did not happen to the relief of those who would have to compete with Apple. Although Apple already has a bridgehead into the payments business thanks to iTunes, experts seem to think Apple will refrain from entering the mobile payments business.

Read more

  • Small Banks Excel at Industry Specialization

Barlow Research Analyst’s Journal

Many business banking customers value financial institutions and banking relationships that cater to their specific industry’s needs. Unfortunately, not all business customers believe their bank is industry-focused. However, customers that believe their primary bank caters to their specific industry needs appear to be more confident about the financial condition of their company, as well as their industry and believe their banker is more knowledgeable about their business. Barlow Research’s Second Quarter 2013 Economic Pulse provides valuable information about business banking customers’ need for industry-focused financial institutions.

Read more

  • The five layers of Online banking security

CIOL

It is becoming increasingly critical that financial institutions ensure their consumer and corporate banking customers are able to access their accounts with the highest reasonable security, using a process that is very straightforward and approachable. There have been significant changes in the threat landscape for online banking. In order to protect customers using Internet-based products and services, such as applications, the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FIEC) and other regulators have instituted significantly more stringent requirements for financial institutions. Ensuring a compliant security program requires the execution of a good, multi-faceted authentication solution.

Read more

  • Retailers likely to be winners in m-payments, with banks making it work, suggests leading banker

Internet Retailer

Mobile payments is currently a three way battle for consumers being fought out between retailers, banks and mobile network operators – each keen to ‘own the customer’ – but it will be retailers and banks that win, leading m-payment experts concluded at the International Payment Summit (IPS) in London last week. Mobile operators are likely to end up just as dumb pipes. Retailers, banks and operators are all looking towards mobile wallets as the key to mobile payments and this is likely how the technology will start to gain traction in mainstream retail and it is through this that mobile payments will start to be used. But who will brand the wallets and how do you make sure not every retailer, bank and brand that a consumer uses has its own wallet?

Read more

  • What Bank Branch Closures Mean for Consumers

U.S. News

The traditional notion of banking, in which customers visit their local branch to deposit money, check their balance or take out a loan, may no longer be the reality. In the past year, American banks shuttered more than 2,000 branch locations—and news of additional closings appears on a regular basis. Banks cite rising operation costs and shifts in consumer-banking behaviors as primary causes for reducing the number of branches. For banks, these decisions are a matter of improving their bottom line, but for customers, these closings may force them to develop new habits. In one way or another, most people are likely to notice a change in how they interact with their bank.

Read more

The New Paper Chase

It’s always interesting to examine trends taking shape at the intersection of financial services and technology, as this blog does so often. But there’s one issue that’s frequently gets overlooked and yet is still the giant elephant in the room: paper.

Yes, paper. We’re a couple of decades into the era of e-commerce, and for many of us even bills arriving via snail-mail seem like a rarity. We have a staggering array of online tools that enables us to do virtually everything financial, from anywhere at any time. What’s paper got to do with it?

The short answer is: a lot. This is particularly true of checks, as used by millions of consumers and even small and mid-sized businesses. But in many other areas too, it’s an area in which change has been surprisingly slow. On the flip side, doing away with paper will bring enormous benefits, from speedier transactions and greater savings to environmental preservation.

It’s been almost a decade since the Check 21 Act passed in late 2003, allowing financial institutions to create digital versions of original checks. Today, banks deal with each other almost entirely through electronic transfers—once the actual check has been submitted, it disappears from the process.

But tell that to the entities writing the checks in the first place. To be sure, the numbers are dropping, however slowly—there’s close to 2 billion fewer written each successive year. But at this rate, it will take until 2026 for paper checks to be eliminated altogether.

That’s the conclusion in a study published last year by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. According to the same report, the benefits are undeniable: getting rid of paper saves the banking industry $1.2 billion a year, while consumers and businesses keep $2 billion in benefits through faster payment processing.

Of course, few trends in technology stay at the same rate—there are frequent spikes and pullbacks, and unexpected accelerations that blow away all estimates. No one expected tablet adoption to grow at such a staggering pace, but it has. It took almost 10 years for smartphones to reach 40 million users (which admittedly meant replacing older models), while that number was crossed only two years after the emergence of the Apple iPad.

Just this week, Juniper Research estimated that tablet buying will lead to 200 million users of “transactional tablet banking services” by 2017. By that time, one in four tablet users will be paying their bills via those devices. There are other signs too—let’s not forget that Amazon used to accept checks, but discontinued the practice in 2008.

There’s now a broad variety of services designed in part to wean users off the habit of writing checks. For example, most banks now offer the ability to capture a check image via smartphone and make an instant deposit. And any number of other providers, from thriving vendors like Square to newer entrants like Zipmark—which styles itself as the digital checkbook—make it easy to avail of the new capabilities.

The changes will have tremendous ramifications: Intuit, which now has close to 30 million customers for its payments services and processes $38 billion a year in payments, estimates that it could increase its payments business by $4 billion by getting QuickBooks software customers, mostly small businesses, to use the payments service.

At this point, the use of paper seems almost a throwback to an earlier time, but the numbers clearly belie the perception. Getting rid of it from the world of finance would likely do a world of good. And given the justified concerns over rainforests and a rapidly declining ecosystem, it would actually do the world good too.

Platform Shift in the Making

What does the banking industry as a whole have to do with Amazon, Microsoft and Apple? Just about nothing—and down the road, it may turn into a major problem (if it isn’t already).

Consider the many stories emerging from the realm of technology that have to do with financial services. Just last week, Amazon unveiled Amazon Coins, billed as “a new currency for Kindle Fire.” To launch the program, the company will dole out coins to customers (each coin is worth a cent), giving them essentially free access to apps and other services available on Kindle. The company can afford the generosity; late last year, it raised $3 billion through its first bond offering in a long time. Giving customers some free money is a great way to raise goodwill and popularize a new program that represents a new channel for transactions. For their part, app developers get another source of monetization.

See which industry is missing from this process?

Actually, the new “currency” is just the latest salvo in the ongoing battle between Amazon, Google, Apple and Microsoft to seed new apps on their respective platforms: Android, iOS and whatever mobile iteration of Windows happens to be in vogue. It’s not really about new software; it’s about creating mobile and other technologies that become increasingly embedded in the daily lives of consumers and business professionals everywhere. More apps, more users, more transactions, more money—that’s how it works. And at the core of this financially intense ecosystem will be. . .the technology platform companies.

In other words, it won’t be the banks.

The way these conglomerates (and it’s appropriate in this context to see Amazon as a technology provider) are driving app development is itself noteworthy. Each company is using a different model for the platform war, raising comparisons to everything from currency manipulation in China to ‘quantitative easing.’

For the record, it looks as if Apple still has a major advantage, thanks in part to being first to market with a smartphone and tablet. But few leads in the technology industry last very long. Kindle still has significant mindshare through its e-reader fan base, Google has racked up major partnerships for Android, and counting out Microsoft is often a mistake. (The company, which has at least as much in assets as Amazon, has been subsidizing developers to the tune of up to $600,000 per app for the Windows Phone, and the just-released Microsoft Surface Pro will likely have even more support, along with the massive user base for Windows PCs.)

We may also see more platforms emerge and find an audience. Facebook, which has already stirred interest with Facebook Credits, could yet become a financial services platform of its own, enabling consumers to pay bills and transfer funds when they go online to post a comment about a movie.

It’s not quite fair to suggest that banks are already irrelevant, but they may be in danger of getting to that point. The financial services industry has long been seen as the enabler for all other forms of commerce, which automatically brought with it a significant level of power. Is that power corroding?

If the role of enabler moves from banking institutions to technology platforms and the companies that own them, and the center of gravity shifts from Wall Street to Silicon Valley—a status some already crave—will that be a good thing?

We’ve commented earlier in this space how the two industries are dramatically different in their operating philosophies. New technologies considered “disruptive” win praise, while new releases from financial services providers that play the same role create instability and roil the markets. There are always new technology companies climbing into the upper echelons of the industry, while the top tier in banking seldom changes except through consolidation.

It’s not as if banks can’t handle technology—they have huge IT departments to run daily operations and regularly release custom apps designed to draw new business and ease customer engagement. But it may be time to go further.

Could banks do what Amazon did and release their own hardware? Should they partner with Apple, Google or Microsoft to gain more control at the platform level? Is it feasible to compete with those companies on their own turf and develop a banking-centric platform?

We don’t have the answers to any of this yet, but we may need some soon.

 

The World’s Most Innovative Companies: Where Are the Financial Institutions?

Forbes recently released its list of the World’s Most Innovative Companies, aiming to answer the question, “Which leading-edge corporations are most likely to succeed now and in the future?”

The list, which is based on an eight-year study, used a unique methodology to calculate the companies that made the final cut. Rather than ask executives to vote on which companies should appear, factors such as financial performance, investors’ bids on stock prices and expectations of future results (new products, services, markets) determined the companies on the list.

Tech giants such as Apple, Amazon, Google, Oracle, Intuit and Salesforce were on the list, as well as consumer facing companies Starbucks, PepsiCo and Hershey.  One sector without a large presence on this list: financial institutions. You can view the complete list here.

As the Banking.com staff read through the list, we wondered, why aren’t there more financial institutions on this list? What are your thoughts? Leave us a message in the comments section below.